About 365 minutes
The Ladies Book of Useful Information Compiled from many sources — Reading Companion
Medicine
83,759 recorded words. 20 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #26368This digital edition of Woman Her Sex and Love Life — Reading Notes is described by source-level measurements including 88,412 words, 6 hr 25 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 23.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Women -- Health and hygiene,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 365 minutes
Medicine
83,759 recorded words. 20 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #26368About 363 minutes
Medicine
83,436 recorded words. 22 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #60773About 352 minutes
Medicine
80,958 recorded words. 33 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #19261Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 93 public books, 93 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergThe book opens with an unexpected choice: an Oriental legend of woman's creation, in which Twashtri fashions her from the moon's roundness, the serpent's undulations, and the cruelty of the tiger. This poetic, almost whimsical beginning sits oddly beside the clinical authority of the author's medical titles. Robinson, a specialist in genito-urinary diseases and sexology, immediately signals that his work will move between literary embellishment and blunt physiological counsel.
The legend serves as a framing device, but the excerpts that follow shift sharply into eugenic argument and diagnostic taxonomy. A first-time reader should note this tonal pivot: the book does not sustain the opening's charm. Instead, it quickly adopts a prescriptive, alarmist voice about heredity and marriage.
Robinson reproduces the Hindu creation myth in full, calling it “exquisitely charming” and “superior to the Biblical narrative.” The legend lists woman's attributes as a composite of natural and animal qualities: the roundness of the moon, the undulations of the serpent, the vanity of the peacock, the cruelty of the tiger. This is not a neutral preface. It establishes woman as a paradoxical being—beautiful, inconstant, and dangerous. The reader should watch how this mythic portrait echoes in later chapters. Does the author treat women as inherently contradictory? The legend's placement at the start suggests a thematic thread, but the excerpts do not show Robinson returning to it explicitly.
In a later passage, Robinson argues that feeblemindedness in women is “more dysgenic than insanity” and often goes undetected because it “passes for 'cuteness.'” He warns that brilliant men may marry pretty, shy, feebleminded girls, only to discover the truth weeks after the ceremony. The language is urgent: “the brilliant father's heart breaks.” Robinson advocates sterilization or segregation as the only safeguard against “pollution with feebleminded stock.” Notably, he permits marriage after sterilization. This section reveals the book's social agenda: it is not merely a health manual but a eugenic treatise. The reader should note how Robinson merges medical authority with social prescription, and how his concern for hereditary quality overrides individual choice.
Robinson divides insanity into two categories: functional (curable, non-hereditary) and organic (hereditary, due to brain degeneration). He gives examples of functional insanity—shock, shipwreck, puerperal fever—and insists these are not transmissible. Organic insanity, expressed as manic-depressive states, is hereditary. But he then undercuts the fear: “our entire conception as to the hereditary transmissibility of insanity has undergone a radical change.” He notes that an insane relative once weighed “like a veritable incubus” on a family, causing secret anguish. This passage shows Robinson attempting to reassure readers while still maintaining a eugenic framework. The reader should observe how he balances clinical nuance with social anxiety, and how the book's structure moves from general principles to specific warnings.
Robinson writes as a physician addressing a lay audience, but his tone is often more polemical than pedagogical. He uses first-person plural (“we will not here go into a discussion”) and direct address (“you will have to check the laws”). His credentials—listed in full—bolster his authority. The book's twenty-first edition in 1929 suggests a sustained readership. The reader should consider who this audience was: likely married adults, perhaps men, given the focus on choosing a wife. The excerpts do not include any preface or table of contents, so the book's full scope remains unclear. But the combination of myth, eugenics, and clinical taxonomy indicates a work that aimed to be both entertaining and instructive, though its advice is firmly rooted in early twentieth-century anxieties.
These excerpts reveal a book that oscillates between literary flourish and rigid biological determinism. The reader should approach it as a historical document of sexology and eugenics, not as a modern health guide. Pay attention to how Robinson uses myth to frame his arguments, and how his clinical categories serve social ends. The gaps—what he does not discuss, whom he does not address—are as telling as his explicit claims.
I found myself thinking of that brittle little New York manual, so earnestly sorting minds into functional or organic, and it reminded me of another earnest sorting, the doctor abroad cataloguing fevers by their humors. Both felt less like science and more like men trying to trap a slippery world. An Account of the Diseases which were most frequent in the British military hospitals in Germany — Key Ideas to Explore wears its own quiet armor, distant and disciplined, yet the same tender hand traces its margins. Strange, how the gravest lists can feel so private.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.